PPY-cell hyperplasia accompanying NENs: Immunohistochemical and nuclear medicine analysis.

Pancreatic polypeptide cell hyperplasia (PPY-H) is a multiplication of the neuroendocrine cells producing pancreatic polypeptide (PPY). The development and role of PPY-H and its corresponding clinical and imaging findings still need to be fully elucidated. We present 12 cases of PPY-H accompanying pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN). PPY-H was analyzed with the help of immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy; preoperative clinical data and imaging studies were evaluated retrospectively. We observed PPY-H emerging from pancreatic ducts, and in some cases, we observed simultaneous NKX6.1 positivity in ducts and PPY-H. Additional clinical-pathological correlations suggests that gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., epigastric pain and cholestasis) could be more related to PPY-H than to NEN hormonal production. In particular cases, SSTR2 expression was strong in PPY-H and correlated with distinguishable accumulation of activity next to NEN on 99 mTc EDDA/Hynic-TOC SPECT/CT. In another case, 18F-FDG-PET/CT showed increased metabolic activity in the area of PPY-H surrounding NEN. Our data suggest that PPY-H originates in the lining of pancreatic ducts. Confirmation of SSTR2 in PPY-H, using immunohistochemistry, suggests the utility of 99 mTc EDDA/Hynic-TOC or 68Ga-DOTA radiotracers in clinical diagnostics; however, studies with larger cohort are needed.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormones secreted by pancreatic endocrine tumors.

The endocrine component of the pancreas is located primarily in the islets of Langerhans, but is also found as single cells among the acinar cells and duct epithelium. It currently is thought that endocrine tumors of the pancreas (PETs) arise from pluripotent stem cells located within the ductal epithelium rather than from existing endocrine cells. Islet cell components include alpha, beta, PP, delta and epsilon cells, which secrete glucagon, insulin, pancreatic polypeptide, somatostatin and ghrelin, respectively. We investigated immunohistochemical labeling of 24 formalin fixed paraffin embedded PETs to identify which hormones were produced most frequently. Glucagon was the most frequently secreted hormone (83%) in PETS followed by insulin, ghrelin, pancreatic polypeptide and somatostatin.

Stereochemistry-Driven Interactions of α,γ-Peptide Ligands with the Neuropeptide Y Y4-Receptor.

The G-protein-coupled Y4-receptor (Y4R) and its endogenous ligand, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), suppress appetite in response to food intake and, thus, are attractive drug targets for body-weight control. The C-terminus of human PP (hPP), T32-R33-P34-R35-Y36-NH2, penetrates deep into the binding pocket with its tyrosine-amide and di-arginine motif. Here, we present two C-terminally amidated α,γ-hexapeptides (1a/b) with sequence Ac-R31-γ-CBAA32-R33-L34-R35-Y36-NH2, where γ-CBAA is the (1R,2S,3R)-configured 2-(aminomethyl)-3-phenylcyclobutanecarboxyl moiety (1a) or its mirror image (1b). Both peptides bind the Y4R (Ki of 1a/b: 0.66/12 nM) and act as partial agonists (intrinsic activity of 1a/b: 50/39%). Their induced-fit binding poses in the Y4R pocket are unique and build ligand-receptor contacts distinct from those of the C-terminus of the endogenous ligand hPP. We conclude that energetically favorable interactions, although they do not match those of the native ligand hPP, still guarantee high binding affinity (with 1a rivaling hPP) but not the maximum receptor activation.

Obesity is associated with impaired postprandial pancreatic polypeptide secretion.

Objective: This study aims to compare the levels of serum pancreatic polypeptide (PP), insulin (INS), C-peptide (C-P), and glucagon (GCG) before and after glucose stimulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with different body mass indexes (BMI), analyze the relevant factors associated with PP secretion, and further investigate the role of PP in the development of obesity and diabetes. Methods: Data were collected from 83 patients from the hospital. The subjects were divided into normal-weight group, overweight group, and obese group according to their BMI. All subjects were tested with the standard bread meal test (SBMT). PP and relevant parameters were measured, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated after 120 min of SBMT. AUCpp (AUC of PP) was used as the dependent variable, and the potential influencing factors were used as independent variables for multiple linear regression analysis. Results: The obese and overweight groups had significantly lower PP secretion than the normal-weight group (485.95 pg·h/ml, 95% CI 76.16-895.74, p = 0.021; 664.61 pg·h/ml, 95% CI 285.46-1043.77, p = 0.001) at 60 min postprandial. PP secretion in the obese and overweight groups was also significantly lower than that in the normal-weight group (520.07 pg·h/ml, 95% CI 186.58-853.56, p = 0.003; 467.62 pg·h/ml, 95% CI 159.06-776.18, p = 0.003) at 120 min postprandial. AUCpp was negatively associated with BMI (r = -0.260, p = 0.017) and positively associated with AUCGCG (r = 0.501, p< 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that there was a linear correlation between AUCGCG, BMI, and AUCpp (p< 0.001, p = 0.008). The regression equation was calculated as follows: AUCpp = 1772.255-39.65 × BMI + 0.957 × AUCGCG (R2 = 54.1%, p< 0.001). Conclusion: Compared with normal-weight subjects, overweight and obese subjects had impaired PP secretion after glucose stimulation. In T2DM patients, PP secretion was mainly affected by BMI and GCG. Clinical trial registry: The Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100047486.

Identification, Measurement, and Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Human Pancreatic Polypeptide by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Human pancreatic polypeptide (HPP) is a 36 amino acid peptide hormone that plays a role in the bidirectional communication between the digestive system and the brain. HPP measurements are used to assess vagal nerve function following sham feeding and to detect gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors. These tests have historically been conducted by radioimmunoassays, but liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has several advantages such as improved specificity and elimination of radioactive molecules. Here, we present our LC-MS/MS method. Initially, samples were immunopurified and subjected to LC-high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometry (HRAM-MS/MS) to identify circulating forms of the peptide in human plasma. We identified 23 forms of HPP, including several glycosylated forms. The most abundant peptides then were used for targeted LC-MS/MS measurements. LC-MS/MS performance for precision, accuracy, linearity, recovery, limit of detection, and carryover met our acceptance criteria based on CLIA regulations. Additionally, we observed the expected physiological rise in HPP in response to sham feeding. Our results indicate that HPP measurement by LC-MS/MS produces clinically equivalent results to our established immunoassay when several peptides are monitored, making it a suitable replacement. The measurement of peptide fragments, including modified species, might have additional clinical value.

Counter-regulatory responses to postprandial hypoglycaemia in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia vs surgical and non-surgical control individuals.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Post-bariatric hypoglycaemia is an increasingly recognised complication of bariatric surgery, manifesting particularly after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. While hyperinsulinaemia is an established pathophysiological feature, the role of counter-regulation remains unclear. We aimed to assess counter-regulatory hormones and glucose fluxes during insulin-induced postprandial hypoglycaemia in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs surgical and non-surgical control individuals. METHODS: In this case-control study, 32 adults belonging to four groups with comparable age, sex and BMI (patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and non-surgical control individuals) underwent a postprandial hypoglycaemic clamp in our clinical research unit to reach the glycaemic target of 2.5 mmol/l 150-170 min after ingesting 15 g of glucose. Glucose fluxes were assessed during the postprandial and hypoglycaemic period using a dual-tracer approach. The primary outcome was the incremental AUC of glucagon during hypoglycaemia. Catecholamines, cortisol, growth hormone, pancreatic polypeptide and endogenous glucose production were also analysed during hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: The rate of glucose appearance after oral administration, as well as the rates of total glucose appearance and glucose disappearance, were higher in both Roux-en-Y gastric bypass groups vs the non-surgical control group in the early postprandial period (all p<0.05). During hypoglycaemia, glucagon exposure was significantly lower in all surgical groups vs the non-surgical control group (all p<0.01). Pancreatic polypeptide levels were significantly lower in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia vs the non-surgical control group (median [IQR]: 24.7 [10.9, 38.7] pmol/l vs 238.7 [186.3, 288.9] pmol/l) (p=0.005). Other hormonal responses to hypoglycaemia and endogenous glucose production did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The glucagon response to insulin-induced postprandial hypoglycaemia is lower in post-bariatric surgery individuals compared with non-surgical control individuals, irrespective of the surgical modality. No significant differences were found between patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia and surgical control individuals, suggesting that impaired counter-regulation is not a root cause of post-bariatric hypoglycaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04334161.

Pancreatic polypeptide revisited: Potential therapeutic effects in obesity-diabetes.

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), a member of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family of peptides, is a hormone secreted from the endocrine pancreas with established actions on appetite regulation. Thus, through activation of hypothalamic neuropeptide Y4 (NPY4R or Y4) receptors PP induces satiety in animals and humans, suggesting potential anti-obesity actions. In addition, despite being actively secreted from pancreatic islets and evidence of local Y4 receptor expression, PP mediated effects on the endocrine pancreas have not been fully elucidated. To date, it appears that PP possesses an acute insulinostatic effect, similar to the impact of other peptides from the NPY family. However, it is interesting that prolonged activation of pancreatic Y1 receptors leads to established benefits on beta-cell turnover, preservation of beta-cell identity and improved insulin secretory responsiveness. This may hint towards possible similar anti-diabetic actions of sustained Y4 receptor modulation, since the Y1 and Y4 receptors trigger comparable cell signalling pathways. In terms of exploiting the prospective therapeutic promise of PP, this is severely restricted by a short circulating half-life as is the case for many regulatory peptide hormones. It follows that long-acting, enzyme resistant, forms of PP will be required to determine viability of the Y4 receptor as an anti-obesity and -diabetes drug target. The current review aims to refocus interest on the biology of PP and highlight opportunities for therapeutic development.

A Reduced Pancreatic Polypeptide Response is Associated With New-onset Pancreatogenic Diabetes Versus Type 2 Diabetes.

PURPOSE: Pancreatogenic diabetes refers to diabetes mellitus (DM) that develops in the setting of a disease of the exocrine pancreas, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). We sought to evaluate whether a blunted nutrient response of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) can differentiate these DM subtypes from type 2 DM (T2DM). METHODS: Subjects with new-onset DM (<3 years' duration) in the setting of PDAC (PDAC-DM, n = 28), CP (CP-DM, n = 38), or T2DM (n = 99) completed a standardized mixed meal tolerance test, then serum PP concentrations were subsequently measured at a central laboratory. Two-way comparisons of PP concentrations between groups were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and analysis of covariance while adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. RESULTS: The fasting PP concentration was lower in both the PDAC-DM and CP-DM groups than in the T2DM group (P = 0.03 and <0.01, respectively). The fold change in PP at 15 minutes following meal stimulation was significantly lower in the PDAC-DM (median, 1.869) and CP-DM (1.813) groups compared with T2DM (3.283; P < 0.01 for both comparisons). The area under the curve of PP concentration was significantly lower in both the PDAC-DM and CP-DM groups than in T2DM regardless of the interval used for calculation and remained significant after adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting PP concentrations and the response to meal stimulation are reduced in new-onset DM associated with PDAC or CP compared with T2DM. These findings support further investigations into the use of PP concentrations to characterize pancreatogenic DM and to understand the pathophysiological role in exocrine pancreatic diseases (NCT03460769).

Assessing the Pathophysiology of Hyperglycemia in the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms Study: From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium.

OBJECTIVES: The metabolic abnormalities that lead to diabetes mellitus (DM) after an episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) have not been extensively studied. This article describes the objectives, hypotheses, and methods of mechanistic studies of glucose metabolism that comprise secondary outcomes of the DREAM (Diabetes RElated to Acute pancreatitis and its Mechanisms) Study. METHODS: Three months after an index episode of AP, participants without preexisting DM will undergo baseline testing with an oral glucose tolerance test. Participants will be followed longitudinally in three subcohorts with distinct metabolic tests. In the first and largest subcohort, oral glucose tolerance tests will be repeated 12 months after AP and annually to assess changes in ß-cell function, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity. In the second, mixed meal tolerance tests will be performed at 3 and 12 months, then annually, and following incident DM to assess incretin and pancreatic polypeptide responses. In the third, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance tests will be performed at 3 months and 12 months to assess the first-phase insulin response and more precisely measure ß-cell function and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The DREAM study will comprehensively assess the metabolic and endocrine changes that precede and lead to the development of DM after AP.

Functional Insulinomas in a Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta).

We report a rare case of functional insulinomas in a 16.7-year-old female Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) that was presented with neuroglycopenic signs to the breeding colony hospital at the Tulane National Primate Research Center. At initial and follow-up examinations, the animal was consistently hypoglycaemic and was clinically maintained with additional fruits, other high-sugar food items and dextrose supplementation. Occasional episodes of seizure and collapse resolved quickly on administration of high-sugar food items. At necropsy, the uncinate process of the pancreas had a 2.2 cm diameter, red, round, firm neoplastic mass, and another neoplasm was identified on histological examination of the head of pancreas. Histologically, neoplastic cells exhibited neuroendocrine packeting, resembled pancreatic islet cells and immunolabelled for chromogranin A, synaptophysin and insulin but not for somatostatin, gastrin or pancreatic polypeptide. A few cells immunolabelled for glucagon. The clinical signs and gross and histological findings were consistent with functional insulinomas.

Establishment of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for mouse pancreatic polypeptide clarifies the regulatory mechanism of its secretion from pancreatic γ cells.

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP), secreted from γ cells of the islets of Langerhans, is a 36 amino-acid peptide encoded by the Ppy gene. Although previous studies have reported that PP causes a decrease in appetite, the molecular mechanism that regulates PP secretion has not been fully elucidated. Lack of understanding of the regulatory mechanism of PP secretion may be partially owing to the lack of assay systems that can specifically detect PP. We recently developed the mouse monoclonal antibody 23-2D3 that specifically recognizes PP. In the present study, we developed a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the measurement of mouse PP, and directly monitored intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in Ppy-expressing cells from a newly developed reporter mouse. Using these systems, we identified agonists, such as carbachol and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), which stimulate PP secretion. We further demonstrated that, unlike the case of GIP-induced insulin secretion from ß cells, there is a unique mechanism by which PP secretion is triggered by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations via voltage-dependent calcium channels even in low-glucose conditions.

Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with enhanced postprandial pancreatic polypeptide secretion.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare serum pancreatic polypeptide (PP), insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon in different glucose tolerance stages; analyze the influencing factors of PP secretion; and further explore the role of PP in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Data were collected from 100 subjects from hospital. According to the results of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the subjects were divided into a normal glucose tolerance (NGT) group, an impaired glucose regulation (IGR) group, and a newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) group. PP and the related parameters were measured, and the area under the curve (AUC) 120 min after OGTT was calculated. AUCpp (AUC of PP) was used as the dependent variable and the potentially influencing factors were used as the independent variable for multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Postprandial 60 min PP in the IGR group was higher than those in the NGT group (2973.80 [±547.49] pg·h/mL vs 2663.55 [±594.89] pg·h/mL, p < 0.05). AUCpp was significantly higher in the IGR group (428.76 pg·h/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] [41.06 -816.46], p = 0.031) and newly diagnosed T2DM group (404.35 pg·h/mL, 95% CI [5.37-803.33], p = 0.047) than in the NGT group. AUCpp was negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.235, p = 0.038) and positively correlated with postprandial 60 min blood glucose (r = 0.370, p = 0.001) and AUCbg (AUC of blood glucose) (r = 0.323, p = 0.007). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that there was a linear correlation between BMI, AUCbg , and AUCpp (p = 0.004, p = 0.001), and the regression equation was calculated as: AUCpp  = 6592.272 + 86.275 × AUCbg -95.291 × BMI (R2  = 12.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NGT subjects, IGR and T2DM patients have an enhanced postprandial PP secretion. In T2DMs, the secretion of PP is mainly affected by BMI and blood glucose.

Crystal structures of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY).

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) form the evolutionarily conserved pancreatic polypeptide family. While the fold is widely utilized in nature, crystal structures remain elusive, particularly for the human forms, with only the structure of a distant avian form of PP reported. Here we utilize a crystallization chaperone (antibody Fab fragment), specifically recognizing the amidated peptide termini, to solve the structures of human NPY and human PYY. Intriguingly, and despite limited sequence identity (~50%), the structure of human PYY closely resembles that of avian PP, highlighting the broad structural conservation of the fold throughout evolution. Specifically, the PYY structure is characterized by a C-terminal amidated α-helix, preceded by a backfolded poly-proline N-terminus, with the termini in close proximity to each other. In contrast, in the structure of human NPY the N-terminal component is disordered, while the helical component of the peptide is observed in a four-helix bundle type arrangement, consistent with a propensity for multimerization suggested by NMR studies.

Multiplexed Assay to Quantify the PP-Fold Family of Peptides in Human Plasma Using Microflow Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Peptide Tyr-Tyr (PYY1-36), pancreatic polypeptide (PP1-36) and neuropeptide Y (NPY1-36) constitute the PP-fold family of peptides that is involved in metabolic regulation. Very low plasma concentrations and cleavage into active 3-36 fragments challenge bioanalytical assays used for the quantification of these peptides. METHODS: We developed a multiplexed isotopic dilution assay to quantify PYY1-36, PP1-36, and NPY1-36 and their dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4)-derived metabolites PYY3-36, PP3-36 and NPY3-36. All peptides were immunocaptured from plasma using a monoclonal antibody and quantified by micro-ultra-HPLC-MS/MS. Blood samples from healthy volunteers were collected fasting and 30 min after nutrient stimulation. Method comparison was performed with commercial immunoassays. RESULTS: Linearity was shown in the measured intervals (r2 > 0.99). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) with a CV at 20% was 1.5 pM for PYY1-36 and PYY3-36, 3.0 pM for PP1-36 and PP3-36, 0.8 pM for NPY1-36 and 0.5 pM for NPY3-36. In all cases, intra- and inter-assay bias and imprecision were <21%. Pre-analytical stability required addition of a protease inhibitor cocktail. Physiological concentrations of PYY3-36, NPY3-36, PP1-36 and PP3-36 were above the LLOQ in 43% to 100% of the samples. PYY1-36 and NPY1-36 were above the LLOQ in 9% and 0% of the samples, respectively. Immunoassays showed higher concentrations of measurands and poor agreement when compared with micro-UHPLC-MS/MS. CONCLUSIONS: The assay allowed for specific multiplexed analysis of the PP-fold family of peptides and their DPP4-cleaved fragments in a single sample, thereby offering new perspectives to study the role and therapeutic potential of these essential peptide hormones in health and metabolic disease.

Peptides in the regulation of glucagon secretion.

Glucose homeostasis is maintained by the glucoregulatory hormones, glucagon, insulin and somatostatin, secreted from the islets of Langerhans. Glucagon is the body's most important anti-hypoglycemic hormone, mobilizing glucose from glycogen stores in the liver in response to fasting, thus maintaining plasma glucose levels within healthy limits. Glucagon secretion is regulated by both circulating nutrients, hormones and neuronal inputs. Hormones that may regulate glucagon secretion include locally produced insulin and somatostatin, but also urocortin-3, amylin and pancreatic polypeptide, and from outside the pancreas glucagon-like peptide-1 and 2, peptide tyrosine tyrosine and oxyntomodulin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, neurotensin and ghrelin, as well as the hypothalamic hormones arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin, and calcitonin from the thyroid. Each of these hormones have distinct effects, ranging from regulating blood glucose, to regulating appetite, stomach emptying rate and intestinal motility, which makes them interesting targets for treating metabolic diseases. Awareness regarding the potential effects of the hormones on glucagon secretion is important since secretory abnormalities could manifest as hyperglycemia or even lethal hypoglycemia. Here, we review the effects of each individual hormone on glucagon secretion, their interplay, and how treatments aimed at modulating the plasma levels of these hormones may also influence glucagon secretion and glycemic control.

Gastrointestinal Hormones in Healthy Adults: Reliability of Repeated Assessments and Interrelations with Eating Habits and Physical Activity.

Background: Gastrointestinal hormones (GIHs) are crucial for the regulation of a variety of physiological functions and have been linked to hunger, satiety, and appetite control. Thus, they might constitute meaningful biomarkers in longitudinal and interventional studies on eating behavior and body weight control. However, little is known about the physiological levels of GIHs, their intra-individual stability over time, and their interaction with other metabolic and lifestyle-related parameters. Therefore, the aim of this pilot study is to investigate the intra-individual stability of GIHs in normal-weight adults over time. Methods: Plasma concentrations of ghrelin, leptin, GLP-1 (glucagon-like-peptide), and PP (pancreatic polypeptide) were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 17 normal-weight, healthy adults in a longitudinal design at baseline and at follow-up six months later. The reliability of the measurements was estimated using intra-class correlation (ICC). In a second step, we considered the stability of GIH levels after controlling for changes in blood glucose and hemoglobin A1 (HbA1c) as well as self-reported physical activity and dietary habits. Results: We found excellent reliability for ghrelin, good reliability for GLP1 and PP, and moderate reliability for leptin. After considering glucose, HbA1c, physical activity, and dietary habits as co-variates, the reliability of ghrelin, GLP1, and PP did not change significantly; the reliability of leptin changed to poor reliability. Conclusions: The GIHs ghrelin, GLP1, and PP demonstrated good to excellent test-retest reliability in healthy individuals, a finding that was not modified after adjusting for glucose control, physical activity, or dietary habits. Leptin showed only moderate to poor reliability, which might be linked to weight fluctuations, albeit small, between baseline and follow-up assessment in our study sample. Together, these findings support that ghrelin, GLP1, and PP might be further examined as biomarkers in studies on weight control, with GLP1 and PP serving as anorexic markers and ghrelin as an orexigenic marker. Additional reliability studies in obese individuals are necessary to verify or refute our findings for this cohort.

Supraphysiological effects of pancreatic polypeptide on gastric motor function and nutrient tolerance in humans.

Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) is known to affect food intake. In this exploratory study, we set out to investigate its supraphysiological effect on food tolerance, gastric accommodation, and emptying. In 12 healthy volunteers, 0, 3, or 10 pmol*kg-1 *min-1 PP was administered intravenously (PP0, PP3 or PP10). Thirty minutes thereafter, nutrient drink infusion (60 ml*min-1 ) through a nasogastric feeding tube was started until maximum satiation. Gastric accommodation was assessed by measuring the intragastric pressure (IGP; nasogastric manometry). In a separate test, the effect of PP0 or PP10 on gastric emptying was tested in 10 healthy volunteers and assessed using the 13 C breath test. Results are presented as mean ± SEM, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. For the IGP test, PP increased ingested nutrient volume: 886 ± 93, 1059 ± 124, and 1025 ± 125 ml for PP0, PP3, and PP10, respectively (p = 0.048). In all groups, Nadir IGP values were reached upon food intake (transformed values: 1.5 ± 0.2, 1.7 ± 0.3, and 1.6 ± 0.3 mmHg for PP0, PP3, and PP10, respectively; NS) to return to baseline thereafter. For the gastric emptying study, volunteers ingested a similar nutrient volume: 802 ± 119 and 1089 ± 128 ml (p = 0.016), and gastric half-emptying time was 281 ± 52 and 249 ± 37 min for PP0 and PP10, respectively (NS). No significant correlation between tolerated nutrient volume and IGP drop (R² < 0.01; p = 0.88 for PP0 vs. PP3 and R² =0.07; p = 0.40 for PP0 vs. PP10, respectively) or gastric half-emptying time (R² = 0.12; p = 0.32) was found. A supraphysiological PP dose enhances food tolerance; however, this effect is not mediated through gastric motility. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT03854708 is obtained from clinicaltrials.gov.

Pancreatic Ppy-expressing γ-cells display mixed phenotypic traits and the adaptive plasticity to engage insulin production.

The cellular identity of pancreatic polypeptide (Ppy)-expressing γ-cells, one of the rarest pancreatic islet cell-type, remains elusive. Within islets, glucagon and somatostatin, released respectively from α- and δ-cells, modulate the secretion of insulin by ß-cells. Dysregulation of insulin production raises blood glucose levels, leading to diabetes onset. Here, we present the genetic signature of human and mouse γ-cells. Using different approaches, we identified a set of genes and pathways defining their functional identity. We found that the γ-cell population is heterogeneous, with subsets of cells producing another hormone in addition to Ppy. These bihormonal cells share identity markers typical of the other islet cell-types. In mice, Ppy gene inactivation or conditional γ-cell ablation did not alter glycemia nor body weight. Interestingly, upon ß-cell injury induction, γ-cells exhibited gene expression changes and some of them engaged insulin production, like α- and δ-cells. In conclusion, we provide a comprehensive characterization of γ-cells and highlight their plasticity and therapeutic potential.

High Coexpression of the Ghrelin and LEAP2 Receptor GHSR With Pancreatic Polypeptide in Mouse and Human Islets.

Islets represent an important site of direct action of the hormone ghrelin, with expression of the ghrelin receptor (growth hormone secretagogue receptor; GHSR) having been localized variably to alpha cells, beta cells, and/or somatostatin (SST)-secreting delta cells. To our knowledge, GHSR expression by pancreatic polypeptide (PP)-expressing gamma cells has not been specifically investigated. Here, histochemical analyses of Ghsr-IRES-Cre × Cre-dependent ROSA26-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) reporter mice showed 85% of GHSR-expressing islet cells coexpress PP, 50% coexpress SST, and 47% coexpress PP + SST. Analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data from mouse pancreas revealed 95% of Ghsr-expressing cells coexpress Ppy, 100% coexpress Sst, and 95% coexpress Ppy + Sst. This expression was restricted to gamma-cell and delta-cell clusters. Analysis of several single-cell human pancreatic transcriptome data sets revealed 59% of GHSR-expressing cells coexpress PPY, 95% coexpress SST, and 57% coexpress PPY + SST. This expression was prominent in delta-cell and beta-cell clusters, also occurring in other clusters including gamma cells and alpha cells. GHSR expression levels were upregulated by type 2 diabetes mellitus in beta cells. In mice, plasma PP positively correlated with fat mass and with plasma levels of the endogenous GHSR antagonist/inverse agonist LEAP2. Plasma PP also elevated on LEAP2 and synthetic GHSR antagonist administration. These data suggest that in addition to delta cells, beta cells, and alpha cells, PP-expressing pancreatic cells likely represent important direct targets for LEAP2 and/or ghrelin both in mice and humans.